You have been redirected here from as we are merging our websites to provide you with a one-stop shop for all your investment research needs.

Get Started:To search for a security, type the name or ticker in the search box at the top of the page and select from the dropdown results.

Registered Hemscott users canlog in to Morningstarusing the same login details. Similarly, if you are a Hemscott Premium user, you now have a Morningstar Premium account which you can access using the same login details. contains data, news and research on shares and funds, unique commentary and independent Morningstar research on a broad range of investment products, and portfolio and asset allocation tools to help make better investing decisions.

Find out moreabout Morningstar and the website

Readour top tips for getting the most out of

Locateyour usual features on

Seea comprehensive list of features

3 Top Rated UK Equity Funds for Growth Investors

Looking for long-term growth? These three UK funds are highly rated by fund analysts and employ very different processes to achieve positive returns for investors

Emma Wall: Hello and welcome to the Morningstar series, Ask the Expert. Im Emma Wall and Im joined today by Morningstar Fund Analyst, Daniel Vaughan.

Wall: So, were here today to talk about U.K. growth, one of the sectors that you look after. Whats the first fund were going to highlight today?

Vaughan: Im going to talk about three funds today. Theyve got the common name of growth in their title, although stylistically they are all slightly different in approach. But of course, they have the common objective of trying to make a long-term capital gain for their fund investors.

First one Im going to talk about is the Invesco Perpetual UK Growth Fund managed by Martin Walker. Now, Martin, he is relatively experienced. He has been at Invesco Perpetual since 1999, worked with some very talented investors during his time there and he is now one of the senior members of that team alongside Ciaran Mallon and Mark Barnett. He has been running money in this style since 2003, so he has managed money through a full market cycle.

Wall: There have been some ups and downs since then?

Vaughan: Yes. And he has been through some tough times, but one of the things we like about him is his ability to stick to his approach through more challenging market conditions for his style. He is relatively pragmatic, so you shouldnt expect too much variability in his returns. He combines top-down with bottom-up in his stock selection and as I say, he is pragmatic and valuation-orientated. So, he is not an out-and-out growth investor. We quite often see his fund moving between the blend and the value style boxes on our charts.

Examples of his pragmatism we saw coming out of the global financial crisis where he moved into more economically sensitive areas of the market such as the consumer names and more recently he has been attracted to the energy names where he sees their outlook as more positive than reflected in their share prices, so he is willing to go into those kind of names.

He runs relatively concentrated portfolios. This fund in question has around 50 names, although it has also run the UK Aggressive Fund which is closer to 30 and then more punchy best ideas type fund.

The second fund is the Jupiter UK Growth Fund. This is also a relatively focused fund, its around 35 names. Until very recently this was run by Ian McVeigh and Steve Davies jointly and its undergone a transition over the last few years so that its now solely run by Steve Davies.

Wall: And that can be a red flag for fund analysts, cant it? When management changes and although you say that he was a co-manager and now he has just gone to single manager. So, perhaps not as difficult one to work out what the future will look like?

Vaughan: Well, he had been working alongside Ian McVeigh since 2007 when McVeigh hired him from the sell-side. Weve had frequent contact with him through the years. He was appointed co-manager and given a fund to run in his own right, so he built a track record which was strong and gave us comfort and we think its an example of overtly transition from one manager to another.

Wall: And how will that fund then differ from the one that weve just heard from Invesco, which you say that is a blend of growth and other stars. How does this one differ?

Vaughan: Well, the current portfolio is growth-orientated. He is look for companies where the sales growth is reasonably high and sustainably so, growth above the rate in GDP, but that growth is sustainable and forecastable and also, that growth is backed by strong cash flows. So, thats the core of the portfolio. But what tips it sometimes into the value category more than growth is this bucket of recovery situations which he will buy into.

Wall: Does that mean there is quite a volatile shape because, you know, bottom feeding as they call it, can make for a sort of performance history that can be a little volatile?

Vaughan: Well, the performance history is certainly volatile. As the part of that is they are going into the banks, which they went into quite fully, seeing those names trading below their book values and with prospects that they thought were better than were in the share price, they will go into those. I think that it has 17% of the portfolio in banks the last time we reviewed the fund.

Vaughan: Its come good at times and its also been a real hindrance to their performance at times. So, I mean, this is a concentrated fund again with some big sector bets. Consumer discretionary is another example of their big bet. I think around 40% of the portfolio is in those names; so, willing to really back their conviction when they see an intrinsic value for the names way above the current market price.

Vaughan: The third fund is another example of a pretty punchy portfolio, Mark Slaters Slater Growth Fund. Its actually up until 2009 it was more constrained, but once they loosened those constraints weve seen the pure Slater style come through into that fund. The foundation of their approach is very much the PEG ratio, so thats relationship between price/earnings ratio and the forecast growth rates.

They were again looking for sustainable growth rates and because they have got a free rein to look throughout the market for these kinds of names, he is quite often a portfolio-biased to small caps. So, he has got around 70% in the small and micro-cap.

Wall: Thats something to be aware of because I think some people think of U.K. growth as perhaps a core holding for a portfolio, but if you have a small cap bias you should be aware then that can be a bit more volatile, perhaps is suitable for smaller holding within a portfolio?

Vaughan: Yeah, definitely a more volatile performance profile potentially and especially as this is a focused portfolio and he is willing to run his holdings up to 10% which is the maximum he can have in one name and 10% could be in a small cap name, yeah, youve got to be very wary of what the portfolio makeup is.

Wall: But he knows what he is doing. He has been doing it for a while.

Vaughan: He has been doing it for a very long time. I mean wrote a or he co-authored a book with his father Jim Slater, called The Zulu Principle where they have set out this kind of approach to growth investing and is probably the purest of the three funds in terms of that growth style.

Wall: This is Emma Wall for Morningstar. Thank you for watching.

The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell a security or securities noted within nor should it be viewed as a communication intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. The information contained within should not be a persons sole basis for making an investment decision. Please contact your financial professional before making an investment decision.

Investing in Asian equities can be a bumpy ride. Morningstar fund analyst Simon Dorricott higl…

Just how much you allocate your portfolios towards active or passive funds depends on your per…

Want to invest in UK equities? Once you have decided on the asset allocation, now it is time t…

Canadian Mark Carney has been Governor since the summer of 2013 and will step down at the end of …

Some of the most-popular US technology stocks have dual-class share structures, which give founde…

Mining companies are operating in a challenging environment but could now be the time to top up o…

THE WEEK: Morningstar columnist Rodney Hobson provides two pieces of advice to George Osborne, an…

Businesses that have competitive advantages within their industry are good candidates for dividen…

Morningstar reveals the top 10 best performers over the last five years

Morningstar OBSR reveals the top funds for investors seeking exposure to European equities

Canadian Mark Carney has been Governor since the summer of 2013 and will step down at the end of …

Some of the most-popular US technology stocks have dual-class share structures, which give founde…

Private investor Ken Piercy has made good returns by investing in pharmaceutical and technology s…

Asian and European markets were mixed today ahead of earnings from Facebook, Microsoft, Boeing, V…

ANALYST RATINGS: This week Morningstar analysts reveal new ratings for BlackRock and Royal London…

Morningstar is partly funded by advertising. This helps us pay for the great content, data and tools we provide to all investors. In order to make the advertising relevant to our users we need to understand whether you are an individual investor or financial professional.

I am able to make investment purchases in the United Kingdom

By clicking accept I acknowledge that this website uses cookies and other technologies to tailor my experience and understand how I and other visitors use our site. See Cookie Consent for more detail.

© Copyright 2019 Morningstar.All rights reserved.

The Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks is assigned based on an analysts estimate of a stocks fair value. It is projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Morningstar assigns star ratings based on an analysts estimate of a stocks fair value. Four components drive the Star Rating: (1) our assessment of the firms economic moat, (2) our estimate of the stocks fair value, (3) our uncertainty around that fair value estimate and (4) the current market price. This process culminates in a single-point star rating that is updated daily. A 5-star represents a belief that the stock is a good value at its current price; a 1-star stock isnt. If our base-case assumptions are true the market price will converge on our fair value estimate over time, generally within three years. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks, please visithere

Quantitative Fair Value Estimate represents Morningstars estimate of the per share dollar amount that a companys equity is worth today. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is based on a statistical model derived from the Fair Value Estimate Morningstars equity analysts assign to companies which includes a financial forecast of the company. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is calculated daily. It is a projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Quantiative Fair Value Estimate, please visithere

Please continue to support Morningstar by adding us to your whitelist or disabling your ad blocker while visiting oursite.No ThanksIve disabled itAd blocker detected.

Unfortunately, we detect that your ad blocker is still running.To access our site, simply turn off your ad blocker and press Ive disabled it to continue.